"Unvalidated or Improper Forensic Science" and "Justice for All" Act Reading Report
1. Reading Unvalidated or Improper Forensic Science was an interesting experience that resulted in many valuable insights. However, the most interesting aspect of the reading was that despite all their potential, forensic techniques, for instance hair microscopy or firearm tool mark analysis, hinder investigation and sentencing, rather than facilitate these processes. It was very interesting to read about different factors and forces reducing reliability of various scientific methods. Based on insights obtained from the article, it can be concluded that although DNA testing is a fairly accurate forensic instrument, DNA evidence is not properly used in U.S. criminal system today. The improper use can be attributed to wrongful testimony and forensic misconduct, which results in conviction of the innocent. In the history of domestic criminalistics, there have been many cases, when wrong DNA testing led to conviction of the innocent individuals, for instance Alejandro Gilbert received a guilty verdict on the basis of DNA testing that was not actually done.
2. Justice for All Act is considered to be a worthwhile legislation, because it gives hope for fair trial. Using DNA testing, which is a very accurate forensic instrument, is required to reduce the number of cases in which innocent people are imprisoned or even die in jail. Conducting DNA testing is needed to enhance the prestige of the national law enforcement system positioning itself as fair and unbiased. The cases of Timothy Cole and other unjustly convicted individuals allow assuming that timely and accurate DNA testing is a way to restore justice and bring stability to the lives of many people, including convicts and their families.
Works Cited
Innocence Project. Unvalidated or Improper Forensic Science. Web. 2 January 2016.
Office of Justice Programs. What Is the Justice for All Act? Web. 2 January …
